Showing posts with label obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label obama. Show all posts

Monday, February 16, 2015

The evolution of war

1942 headline

If you have an inkling to unearth the front page of a newspaper from the early 1940's, you will find yourself in a different America.

I've been obliged of late to peruse a lot of news copy from 1942 on, particularly the Cleveland Press and Plain Dealer (PD). The front page of the PD's Nov. 20, 1944 issue contains no less than 20 headlines. Save for one, they all pertain to WWII. Some examples:

Metz Falling As Nazi Front Cracks

Geilenkirchen Taken; French Enter Alsace, Enemy Dropping Back

War Summary

British Women Fighting

Conversely, on the PD's Feb. 15, 2015 front page, there is no mention of Afghanistan. Obviously our military action in Afghanistan and WWII are not comparable. Same goes for our media consumption. There was no television news during WWII. You had the paper and the radio. And to be sure, the War was priority number one. That's because nearly every family had a young man participating in it. They had some skin in the game, literally.

The vast majority of today's Plain Dealer readers don't care much about Afghanistan. It's not their war. They "support" the troops as long as their kid doesn't have to be one of them. I wrote about this insidious disengagement last Memorial Day.

Incidentally, going to see American Sniper does not make you a patriot.

1941 ad clipping
During my research, I found it hard to separate fact from WWII propaganda. Numbers don't add up. Language is politically incorrect. All of it told a story ... and another and another. Perhaps in a future post, I'll write about how you can watch the middle class vanish when you study old newspapers through the years. For starters: they used to be crammed with labor news.

But that is not the point of this post. This is about Obama's formal request for Congress to authorize the use of military force in the war against ISIS.

I have my disappointments with Obama, but I am squarely behind this move (too bad it's six months late). Critics call the request too vague. I laud that very quality. Because while I don't think it's going to wake the somnambulant American public, perhaps it will compel the braying donkeys and lumbering elephants to battle over the specifics of how we shape our engagement in this miserable mess. Perhaps it will foster ownership outside of the White House and Pentagon.

I am hopeful, dear reader, but I'm also fearful that this country has become so huge and calcified, it may be beyond governance.


From sea to shining sea indeed.

*  *  *


Saturday, December 27, 2014

The economically ignorant


Don't ask

From Joe's post dated November 10 in the year of our Lord 2008:

Get ready for $4.00/gallon or more gas again next summer, people ... Let us see, gas lines, runaway inflation and high unemployment. ...The only bright side is I can gloat and say "I told you so" to all of you economically ignorant mofos voting for hope and change.

This is the point at which a good little writer would round up a whole bunch of solid numbers and links touting low gas prices, a soaring stock market, booming economic growth and job creation, but I'm not going to do that. Michael Grunwald did it in this piece for Politico:

Mitt Romney promised to bring unemployment down to 6 percent in his first term; it’s already down to 5.8 percent, half the struggling eurozone’s rate. Newt Gingrich promised $2.50 gas; it’s down to $2.38. Crime, abortion, teen pregnancy and oil imports are also way down, while renewable power is way up and the American auto industry is booming again.

As for poor ol' Joe and the rest of the silly righties, if you want to feel better about your disastrous predictions, scoot on over to the gas station and fill 'er up. Then calculate what that four-dollar-a-gallon tank would have cost and how much you "saved."

Now then, run along back home and write a check in that amount and send it along to your favorite charity.

Can't decide? I'll make it easy for you. Just send the check to me:

Erin O'Brien
P. O. Box 470167
Broadview Heights, OH   44147

Thanks in advance and enjoy a (very economically) Happy New Year!

*  *  *

Thursday, November 20, 2014

The immigrant song


Mediterranean Food Market

Back in early October, I pitched a story on local ethnic grocers to my editor. He gave me the nod and slated it for publication on Nov. 20--today--which serendipitously coincides with President Obama's scheduled remarks on the subject of immigration tonight.

Tink Holl Food Market

The research and writing of the article, The Diverse Language of Food: a Guide to Ethnic Markets, was both grueling and exhilarating. I am very proud of the result. It reflects this town and its people. It's about where we've been, where we are and where we're headed.

Almadina Imports

The people I met as I gallivanted around Cleveland snapping pics and interviewing for this piece were a true inspiration. These are the real Americans--hard working as they endeavor to deliver the very best of the best to their customers. They embrace diversity. They know it's the only way to run a business.

Marco Mougianis at Mediterranean Foods,
the shop his Gramp opened some 50 years ago

Diversity is what built this country. It's the only thing that will save it.

Bob has manned the counter at Krusinski's for 53 years

Now then, dear reader, imagine this. About a week ago when I was deep in the throes of penning my article and a bit breath-taken by it all, I took a break to go to the gym, where I mounted an elliptical machine next to two white men in their sixties. Here are some snippets of their conversation, spoken loudly enough to be heard by anyone within three or four feet.

One mused on people who file for bankruptcy. "I'd shoot all those sonsabitches first. I wouldn't even leave any for pallbearers."

There was another comment about Obama wanting to let "them" all in and how he couldn't remember "the numbers" in California, but "you wouldn't believe."

Race predictably came up.

"Can you imagine if they had a white scholarship fund? Nope. You can only do that for the n-----s."

That's what it looks like folks--the very worst this country has to offer, and a far cry from this quote from Enrique Muniz Jr., owner of La Borincana.

"All the Africans working here are refugees. They came here legally through the Catholic Church. No one wanted to hire them, but we opened our arms and hired them."

Enrique Muniz Jr.

I imagine Obama's upcoming remarks will spur a great deal of talk about immigration in gyms and bars and coffee shops around the country. Which side of history will you be on?

As for me, I'll be here in CLE shining a light on the little corners and rooting for the good guys as the Irish and Hungarian and German blood courses through my veins.



*  *  *

Wednesday, September 10, 2014

Recommendation



Ahead of President Obama's speech tonight, if you have a chance to listen to Dan Carlin's Common Sense Show 280: In Search of Context, it will be an hour very well spent. That podcast might have even more impact after the speech.

You will not feel better afterwards, but you will appreciate his point of view.

*  *  *

Tuesday, July 01, 2014

The Hobby Lobby SCOTUS decision is about diabetes

Sure I'm infuriated over the Hobby Lobby ruling for all the reasons you're reading here on Mr. Gore's Interwebs, but I'm not going to reiterate the rants here. I am, however, going to muse on the big picture.

It's a simple formula, really: take hot button issues like birth control (funny to think something as once-innocuous as birth control is now controversial) and "religious freedom" and put those out front in order to mask your real intentions.

The Hobby Lobby case was just a fingernail working the corner of the Obamacare label, getting it ready to peel off one little shred at a time. Because what corporate America really doesn't want to pay for is your heart disease and your cancer and your diabetes. Those diseases used to be rare. But not only are the numbers skyrocketing, those are also your big ticket items. An IUD is a drop in the bucket compared to any one of your big ticket items.

Why do you think companies are not hiring smokers? Or implementing those darling "wellness programs," in which participants fill out surveys about their body measurements and consumption of cured meats and alcohol, and reaching healthy "goals" is tied to lower deductibles? All that started long before Obama made the scene. Now that the ACA is mandating what will be covered, corporate America must pull out all the stops. And the GOP is happy to assist, starting with something that's easy to get their troops behind: all those silly girls and their birth control pills.

But Erin! It's different with Hobby Lobby! That's about contraception and religious beliefs! My illness is different!

Oh really? Here's an equation for you:

If: Diabetes = Obesity
And: Obesity = Gluttony
And Gluttony = One Of Your Seven Deadly (GASP) Sins
Then: Diabetes = Sin

But Erin! That's not scientific!

Neither is calling an IUD an abortifacient, which didn't matter to SCOTUS one bit.

So to all those celebrating this win in the fight for "religious freedom," you are a prop in the toolbox of Big Business, obediently hammering the inaugural nail in your own coffin--with oodles of enthusiasm, no less.

In ten years (five?), you'll be happily filing for an ACA subsidy when corporate America washes its hands of your insurance. You'll be happily backing an individual mandate. Or voting for the candidate whose running on a "single payer system" platform.

Until then, here's some simple advice: Quit smoking. Lose 20 pounds. Stop drinking so much.

Can't do any of that? Then for chrissake, go for a walk.

The ugliest walking shoe in all of the land, that of Erin O'Brien


*  *  *


Sunday, November 17, 2013

The Obamacare post


What a miserable mess.

My friend Derf summed it up nicely in this strip, but no worries. I will enumerate my complaints herein.

I am disgusted at Obama and his administration for:

1) the dismal lack of communication/education regarding the ACA and the subsequent confusion that has plagued the law from the onset.

2) the abject technical failure of the roll out.
 
The discourse regarding these failures often includes a reference to the three luxurious years Obama had to avoid them. Three whole years! 

Really?

In those three years a couple of tiny details hindered the ACA. Okay, maybe they weren't so tiny. First, there was Supreme Court decision in June 2012 which spilled into the presidential election. Both events were extended dramas we painfully endured until the threatening does the ACA live or die! toggle switch was flipped.

It's easy to say neither spectacle should have affected development of the ACA, but does anyone believe that the entire program didn't suffer while those sorts of razor-sharp pendulums swung above it?

As a backdrop to the battles of 2012, we've had the GOP's war on health care reform from the onset. It included an impressive monolithic opposition, a slew of red states refusing to set up their own exchanges and myriad local efforts to hinder outreach. The list goes on and on.

A few years ago a pundit nailed it. Although I can't recall the details, essentially he said that for a program as big and complex as the ACA to succeed, the entire country would have to work together, including every level of government from state capitols to Pennsylvania Avenue. We have not and (for now) the ACA is floundering. Badly. And whether you like the present health care reform or not, you will pay the price if it fails. This debacle belongs to the entire country no matter which side of the aisle you're on, just like the Iraq War did.

We're all Americans.

Had the conservatives not waged war, but instead rolled up their sleeves as they did with Medicare in 1965 (after fighting its inception and conceding defeat), and worked for the last three years improving the law, things would look a lot different today. The result would not have been perfect, but it would have been better (see: Romneycare). Of course, that's not how it played.

When the Right's euphoria over the troubled ACA subsides, conservatives are going to be left with the not-so-little problem of offering up a health care reform plan of their own. Why have they failed to formulate said plan? After all, they've had three whole luxurious years to do so. The reason is simple: the ACA is conservative health care reform and always has been.

That's correct: conservatives have spent the last three years battling to topple their own solution to health care reform. The proof is the yawning absence of an alternative. Folks, if they had a good idea, we'd have heard it by now. They don't. They never did. Think back on how quickly those enthusiastic chants of Repeal and Replace! were truncated to ... erm ... um ... Repeal!

The only real alternative now is the expansion of a single payer program, which is all I ever wanted. As it stands, one third of the country is already enjoying a big fat GOV socialized health care program by way of Medicare, Medicaid and Tricare. Ironically, the GOP's fervent opposition to reform may lead the country to the one option conservatives hate more than Obamacare.

Holy hospitals, Batman!

A lot of folks are upset over policy cancellations. What a stunning change of heart. I don't remember many in that group being up-in-arms about people losing their coverage before the ACA. Methinks those indignant Righties don't care much about the actual cancellations, although they do like them. Those cancelled policies represent yet another opportunity to attack Obama because he said they wouldn't happen.

You lie!

Truth: the cancelled policy debacle is one of the things that should have been sorted out over the past three years, and likely would have been (along with a host of other problems) if not for the GOP's airtight opposition.

For better or worse, Obama and his signature legislation have sustained some pretty significant wounds in this war. His call for insurers to extend those cancelled policies last week is part of the bleeding.

Yeah, yeah.

A couple of months ago, the big crisis was chemical weapons in Syria. Last month it was the GOV shutdown. Now we have this mess. Maybe it will fade in a couple of months, maybe not. But while it's not my reform of choice (which is single payer for one and for all), I'm still holding out hope for the ACA.

I don't know what will happen, but turning back is not an option. People are no longer going to accept denial of coverage based on a preexisting condition. They are not going to accept the deletion of their otherwise uninsured adult children from their policy. States like Ohio are not going to give back the Medicaid money. Insurance companies are not going to throw out the work of the last three years without legal hellfire. The list gets longer every day. People may not be signing up in droves, but they are signing up.

Dear GOP, please put down your guns. The more you stab at the ACA, the bloodier we're all going to get. It's time to make this goddamn thing work.

Talk about your wishful thinking.

*  *  *

Friday, May 17, 2013

Obama finally does something the GOP loves

Here's a bad idea, I'm going to make a prediction:

The AP phone records grab story is going to fade fast.

I mean come on. Does anyone believe the GOP will really do anything about a covert investigation that included seizing private phone records from the "liberal mainstream" media?

Nope. After all, the right side of the aisle certainly doesn't want any real reforms or legislation in place when it's their turn to spy on journalists.

Now they do have to act like they're upset about the issue because it's associated with Obama, so they might bellyache and get all red-faced, but then this thing is going to disintegrate like a wet Kleenex.

Folks, if something this public and this egregious gets glanced over by our government, say goodbye to the last thin remaining strands of privacy festooning the Constitution.

Aside: How funny is it that the Second Amendment zealots are afraid of a gun registry? As if the gov doesn't have every single one of them on a list anyway. They can find out anything about anyone without any reason, including what guns you own and whether or not you wear ladies' underwear.

Man-o-man, it ain't easy for libs. We put a "lefty" in the Oval Office and he starts doing stuff that would make Nixon blush.

*  *  *

Thursday, November 15, 2012

Wango your tango


Of course I expected the righties to have a collective post-election tantrum. The petitions to secede were predictable enough, although the counter petitions are just plain silly to me, as is the notion of quitting school on account of Obama's win. But running over your husband for not voting? I never saw that coming. And offing yourself over an election is just so sad. Talk about your poor losers.

Yeah, yeah. You can have all that. I'm still waiting for Ted Nugent to either die or go to jail.


*  *  *

Thursday, November 08, 2012

One country for all men


President Obama has folks standing in line to disagree with him, but the fact is that he was re-elected. You had your chance to vote against him. Now it's time to check your bias at the door, support him, and wish him nothing but success. His plan will continue to be executed, but the effectiveness of that plan cannot be determined by President Obama. It's up to everyone else. If you wish for Obama's plan to fail, it's very likely it will. If you work for Obama's plan to succeed, the sky is the limit. The stakes are high. An Obama failure is a failure for the whole country, but the onus for the failure isn't on Obama. It's on you. 

-from Paul Bitzan

*  *  *

Friday, October 19, 2012

Voting right?



My buddy Alex posted this on one of his pages the other day:

I'm voting for the incumbent, but just so we're clear: the Obama administration has increased drone attacks, has advanced a horrendous foreign policy, which violates HUMAN rights, has deported the greatest number of immigrants in history, and has extended the Patriot Act, which gives the government powers to violate American citizens' human rights in this country. 

So, when you go to the polls and you vote for "your man" (in my case Obama), please understand that. All of this brouhaha about women's rights/gay rights means nothing when it's superseded by an administration that has advanced violations of HUMAN rights. Human rights come first and foremost. Whether you are a person of color, gay/transgender, a woman, or an immigrant, the HUMAN rights violations umbrella will swallow you up first. 

Once again, for the 10th presidential election cycle in my life, I am faced with the usual "lesser of two evils" choice. And that is, once again, beyond infuriating. Make sure you understand that the person for whom you're pulling the lever next month is still a cockroach.

While I don't agree with Alex on all points, his comments are valid and we need more like them. His points on drone strikes and the Patriot Act are spot on. I am ashamed to admit that I have all but given up on these big ticket items. You vote for the leftie guy and he acts like a rightie.

~~sigh~~


Life is only so long. I can only worry so much.

But I want to point out a little thing, something specific thing that may well be effected by my vote. Last Saturday, Teresa Dixon Murray ran a Q & A about the CARD act. Therein she said:

Credit card companies are plenty ticked off that new rules that kicked in back in 2010 limit late payment fees to $25 in most cases. Before the change, the average late fee was $39. How would you like it if a certain part of your income went down by 36 percent? 

Clearly, some credit card companies were out of control up to that point: They would charge late fees if your payment wasn't received by 7 a.m. Or they would charge inactivity fees for not using your credit card. Or they could increase your interest rate just because they were in the mood. 

I am not one for predictions, but how likely is it that a Romney administration will plant the seeds to chip away at those regulations? Will we even hear about a quiet amendment that will raise the late payment limit, or a tiny loophole in some giant piece of unrelated legislation that will loosen up rules on raising interest rates?

Dunno, but that's one of the reasons why Obama still has my support. And if it isn't these credit card rules, what other consumer protections will a Romney administration try to erode? How hard will it be to push a few wishy-washy Dems in the Senate to go along?

It won't be be big obvious things. It will be little things. Thousands upon thousands of them. That's how the rich guys do it, folks: inflict death by a thousand cuts.

I can't stop Obama's goddamn drones, but at least I can do my best to keep him in office in order to protect us against swarming stateside sharks--and yes, dear reader, my confidence in that last assertion is only about 75 percent, give or take.



* * *

Friday, October 05, 2012

Debatable

Earlier this week, my fave news show moderator Warren Olney interviewed long-time political consultant Samuel Popkin for the "Reporter's Notebook" segment of his Oct. 2 edition of To the Point.

Why Popkin?

In 1980, as President Jimmy Carter prepared for his debates with GOP challenger Ronald Reagan, Popkin "played" the part of Reagan during the practice sessions. In his To The Point segment, Popkin offers up commentary on Carter and the obscure and mysterious phenomenon of presidential practice debates. It's a great interview that I cannot recommend highly enough. It's only about 10 minutes long and starts at the 40:40 point in the podcast.

I had listened to the Popkin interview before the Wednesday night debate and his insights were spot on. Obama's unease was precisely the sort that Popkin described incumbent presidents falling into for a variety of reasons. The segment was also loaded with great details. This one was my favorite: former Michigan Governor and Dem sweetheart Jennifer Granholm "played" Sarah Palin for Joe Biden while he prepared for the 2008 vice-presidential debate.

You cannot fully appreciate that delicious little tidbit until you dig a sample of Granholm for yourself:



Who is your mama?

*  *  *

Tuesday, October 02, 2012

American muscle


My Gram Soos was born in 1916. Whenever the topic of the Great Depression came up, she'd always fit the following into the conversation.

"You know what ended the Great Depression?" she'd say with the superiority of someone who had lived through it. "The War ended the Great Depression." Then she'd pause and nod. "The War."

The War was of course backed by untold dollars courtesy of Uncle Sam. WWII was the biggest stimulus package of all time, but no one called it that.

Did it work? Hell yes it worked. After all, Hitler was real. Pearl Harbor was real. Americans could see the looming threat and they wanted to be a part of vanquishing it. They were proud to serve and see their sons serve. Americans bucked up behind gas rations and bellied up to city chicken while Rosie the Riveter did her part on the home front. These were the right and patriotic things to do.

The money Uncle Sam spent on WWII was the most effective stimulus of all time because Americans believed in every nickel of it. They perceived it as money that needed to be spent.

This essay could now take a long detour through the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, but I'll leave that circuitous trip for you to meander on your own, dear reader. Instead I'm going to jump to 2009, when, in order to address the financial crash of 2008, Uncle Sam pumped some $800 billion into everything from unemployment to infrastructure, housing to education. Obama's stimulus package was officially titled the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

Unfortunately, John Q. Public didn't believe much in it. You can argue that's because the dollars weren't visible enough or that the GOP bad-mouthed it into dis-credibility or perhaps you have a reason of your own. No matter. In the end, the results were lukewarm at best.

But the auto bailout? Now that was a stimulus with some muscle.


Bush threw the first lifeline to Detroit in 2008 by redirecting some TARP (aka bank bailout) funds. Obama threw more dollars Michigan's way in 2009. In the end, Washington pumped about $80 billion into the withered auto industry. Did it work?

We love our cars. We touch them every day. Our cars are real. I have never owned an American car, but I still love the American car industry. Throw American dollars at something Americans believe in and it will succeed in the game of perception.

Who backed us when we were down?

So despite the initial unpopularity, despite all the bellyaching and moaning from the right, the middle, the wherever, Obama's staggering and consistent lead in Ohio and Michigan should come as no surprise.

Now then, consider this match-up:

Imported From Detroit vs. Let Detroit Fail

We all know the blue collar guy will KO the white collar guy with the first punch. Therein lies the Right's terrible troubles, which are coming to fruition in the wake of its We're-Against-Everything-Obama's-For-No-Matter-What modus operandi. The anti-Detroit campaign might have been appealing from a Forbes point of view--the what-ifs have been endlessly dissected and inspected, but you can't always run the country like a business. Sometimes you've got to listen to America's heart, where you'll find Chevy in a line-up with Mom, baseball and apple pie.

There are some things you should never bet against.


* * *

Saturday, September 15, 2012

On tribal politics

Politics have become so tribal that anyone who works with the other side is viewed by many partisans as a traitor, akin to sleeping with the enemy--Norman Ornstein.
Imagine, dear reader, a Tip O'Neil/Ronald Reagan style handshake in Washington. What the business owners and investors in this country wouldn't do to see that. After all, stability is the single most important ingredient in economic recovery. Unfortunately, however, the GOP is holding stability hostage thanks to the compromise-is-a-dirty-word set.

News flash: when a party moves blindly away from its ideology in order to practice pure obstructionism, it's called tribal politics. Need an example? Let's start with healthcare reform.

2006:  The individual mandate is the Republican answer to health care reform, the construct of a conservative think tank (The Heritage Foundation) and widely approved by conservatives as one of their own (Romney) leads the charge to enact it in the great state of Massachusetts.

 2009: The individual mandate is SOCIALISM!

Where were all the SOCIALISM! screamers before Obama took office? Why weren't they righteously decrying Medicare and Social Security over the years?

Because tribal politics, dear reader, do not adhere to an ideology. The only goal is self-preservation. And although I have no idea what the November end game is going to look like, tribal politics do not seem to be doing Mr. Romney any favors.

In order to lead the tribe into the November battle, Romney was forced to change his positions on abortion, gun control and health care reform--and those are just the obvious ones. Then this week, while President Obama sprang to action condemning the deadly attack on our Libyan embassy and sending security troops to points across the Middle East to protect American interests, Romney promptly started calling the President names and doubling down, making his latest patriotic casualty the unspoken agreement that partisanship ends at the water's edge.

Tribe before country, folks. Always.

(psssst ... hey GOP, you got your ears on? I hate to break this to you fellas, but your relentless attacks on Obama and his policies are starting to backfire. Obama looks more and more like an underdog scrapper against your monolithic party-of-no legislative stance and a stalwart statesman when bullets start to fly. Your man Romney, on the other hand, is looking more and more like a spineless YesMan brown-nosing his monied brethren.)

Oh to be a fly on the office wall of Karl Rove. Oh to hear the insider discussions between the Koch brothers and their minions. Because the real question, dear reader, has to do with the beloved free market. After all, at some point the rate of return on those beauteous donations courtesy of Citizens United might start looking pretty bleak. Don't believe me? At post time, Intrade Odds--which tracks the bettin' man's money--favored Obama's reelection over Romney's chances of taking the White House by more than 30 percent.

Backed into a corner, however, these guys can get pretty desperate. The Kansas GOP tribe even tried scrubbing Obama's name from the Kansas November ballot over more spavined racist birther claims.

Well, well, well. Talk about your American way.

* * *

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Face it


"Even if I am being conservative, I don’t see how Obama can lose." --Allan Lichtman

* * *

Graphic "amalgamation" by dunun via a good citizen.

* * *

Wednesday, October 05, 2011

What's up doc? The Supreme Court

It is time to revive the battle for the public option, which a majority of the American people support whether the White House, the Republicans, the right or the lobbyists like it or not. --Brent Budowsky for The Hill.
So Obama's asked the highest court in the land to review his signature health care reform legislation. Although pundits far and wide believe the court will take the case during this term, it's anybody's guess how its decision will play out.

Iffin' the individual mandate is shot down as unconstitutional, I predict the public option rising from the ashes, with a single payer system looming in the shadows. Might even happen if the mandate is upheld.

Oh damn me all to hell for being a political junkie, but I am what I am.

* * *

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

News correspondent love and Politico is candy-ass

Politico's front page was so right-leaning and obnoxious this morning, it turned my stomach. The lead headline was Why Reporters are Down on Obama.

"President Obama and the media have a surprisingly hostile relationship," the photo caption said.

A long and stunningly self-referential article followed (it's seven pages long, with no less than six links to other Political stories on page one).

Jake Tapper is ABC's White House correspondent and one of my favorite favorite favorite people to follow on twitter. So I tweeted that I'd love to hear Tapper's response to the Politico piece.

Oh joyous day of days, Tapper tweeted me back!

"i'm not part of any of that," Tapper said, "if i have issues with Gibbs, i talk to Gibbs about it myself."

So there you have it. Politco sucks. Jack Tapper rules. And I've got a new sugarpop to add to the short list.

* * *

Saturday, October 10, 2009

My fellow Americans,

Guess what? The Nobel Prize brouhaha doesn't have a lot to do with you. It's the international community saying thank god the United States has finally gotten that tyrant out of the White House and has someone in there who recognizes the other peoples of the world.

The rest of the world really hated George W. Bush and Dick Cheney and their antiquated cold war attitude. Awarding Obama was sort of like a strange sigh of relief from across the globe.

Furthermore, Thorbjoern Jagland, chairman of the Norwegian Nobel Committee,isn't the slightest bit sheepish about the decision.